When I think about activism, the first name that pops into my mind is Clyde Conrad. Both my dad and Uncle Clyde were very involved in things, like rural electricity, rural telephones, marketing boards and so forth--I have just been looking them up in old newspapers, and there is a lot more information about them to collect than I had supposed--but Uncle Clyde was the extrovert of the two brothers, and so much more likely to speak up and take action, to just be really out there, than my dad, who was happier to be Uncle Clyde's cheerleader. Dad cared about political issues, too, but just was not quite as active an activist as his older brother.
I wanted to find the Taber Times article about picketing the Sugar Factory--an Uncle Clyde-led initiative that I remember from my teenage years--but instead I found a bunch of other stuff. Like, in 1958, he participated on a panel discussing pros and cons of fertilizers and irrigation; in 1974, he stepped up to be vocal at an investigation into the way Canadian Western Natural Gas Co. was doing business with rural Albertans; in 1981, he was one of 18 Alberta farmers to write a brief about surface rights on farms--how oil wells on farmland decrease the value of the land, instead of raising it; in 1983, when the Alberta Beet Grower's Association was going to hire a manager, "Clyde Conrad led the opposition" and successfully overturned that initiative. And sometime in the mid-seventies, when the Alberta government was going to quietly pass a law that would have made farmers have to seek permits to move rocks on their property, and I happened to read the teeny tiny notice in the paper and showed my dad, he of course brought it to Uncle Clyde's attention, and Uncle Clyde mobilized a huge protest. Now that I have found Uncle Clyde mentioned way more than I thought he would be in area newspapers, I am going to launch a research project and collect all the information! But for now, I just want to make the point that he was a decades-long activist.
So, he would be very proud of Rachel for her activism! I wanted to record why Rachel is doing this, as I understand it--Nancy can correct me if I get any details wrong.
Nancy and Andrew and their children moved to the Atlanta, Georgia area in July. School became frustrating even before it started because Georgia has some pretty stringent registration requirements. One example of Nancy discussing that can be found here.
Nancy and Andrew eventually decided to home school the younger children, but Rachel (age 12) wanted to attend her middle school. But her middle school is--well, I don't know what to call it; I am just very, very glad that I never had to be a student there. You can't arrive at school early; there is no socialization of the children. The only break in the school day (and Rachel is basically gone from 9-5) is a lunch period during which the students have to sit in ALPHABETICAL ORDER and no talking is allowed. During class time, from my understanding, there is no group work or anything that isn't rigidly doing your work.
So, each grade gets four "recesses" a year. On four occasions spread throughout the year, one of the elective classes (for Rachel those are PE and orchestra) is set aside and the children are allowed to go outside. First, they have to walk around something--the track, maybe? the perimeter of the school grounds?--and after they have ticked off the required walking (which has to be done in silence) then they can actually TALK TO OTHER STUDENTS. Since this NEVER happens at school--Rachel says she spends most of the day being absolutely silent and talks more at home than she ever does at school--the kids look forward to these days. Like, four times a year--you aren't even going to be able to get to know others well enough to make friends--but at least you can get to know someone a little bit better in this relaxed setting where you can talk to whomever you want to talk to.
So the Grade Seven students got their first "recess" of the year a few weeks ago. Five hundred students went outside and did what they were supposed to do--they did their required silent walking. And then students went here and there, scattered around, talking to each other. And that is when two of the 500 got into a fight. Clearly, most of the remaining 498 students wouldn't have even been aware that a fight happened, because they were off doing their own thing. For once!!! Literally, for once!!
And then, afterwards, they learned about the fight because the principal--or vice-principal over their grade--informed them that all other recesses for the year are cancelled for their grade because two students got into a fight. And just like that, their remaining three opportunities to actually talk to other students, and maybe learn how to interact with PEOPLE, which is sort of a necessary life-skill, are gone. They get to just be little learning, studying, test-taking, silent-at-lunch robots who stay in alphabetical order and end the year with exactly no new friends. Doesn't that sound delightful?
So that is why Rachel turned activist. I mean, they already don't have any rights at school, anyway, since they are pretty much regimented every second of the day. So those four recesses per year are greatly looked forward to. So 498 innocent children get to lose their recess rights for the entire year--admittedly, pretty small rights, since that means they only miss 3 recesses--because of two students who most of them don't even know. I mean, there were maybe a few kids who saw the fight and carry some guilt by association, but most of the kids--entirely innocent.
Rachel does want to be a lawyer someday; like the article about her--that never mentions her name except as Dr. Heiss's daughter--says, she grew up on Hamilton and she is well-schooled to think about human rights. I am proud of her, and I know that Uncle Clyde would be even prouder. If he heard about what is going on at her school, he would say, "I am pretty riled about that." And then proceed to do something about it.
I wanted to find the Taber Times article about picketing the Sugar Factory--an Uncle Clyde-led initiative that I remember from my teenage years--but instead I found a bunch of other stuff. Like, in 1958, he participated on a panel discussing pros and cons of fertilizers and irrigation; in 1974, he stepped up to be vocal at an investigation into the way Canadian Western Natural Gas Co. was doing business with rural Albertans; in 1981, he was one of 18 Alberta farmers to write a brief about surface rights on farms--how oil wells on farmland decrease the value of the land, instead of raising it; in 1983, when the Alberta Beet Grower's Association was going to hire a manager, "Clyde Conrad led the opposition" and successfully overturned that initiative. And sometime in the mid-seventies, when the Alberta government was going to quietly pass a law that would have made farmers have to seek permits to move rocks on their property, and I happened to read the teeny tiny notice in the paper and showed my dad, he of course brought it to Uncle Clyde's attention, and Uncle Clyde mobilized a huge protest. Now that I have found Uncle Clyde mentioned way more than I thought he would be in area newspapers, I am going to launch a research project and collect all the information! But for now, I just want to make the point that he was a decades-long activist.
![]() |
| Uncle Clyde giving his MLA, Bob Bogle, a piece of his mind in 1984 |
Nancy and Andrew and their children moved to the Atlanta, Georgia area in July. School became frustrating even before it started because Georgia has some pretty stringent registration requirements. One example of Nancy discussing that can be found here.
Nancy and Andrew eventually decided to home school the younger children, but Rachel (age 12) wanted to attend her middle school. But her middle school is--well, I don't know what to call it; I am just very, very glad that I never had to be a student there. You can't arrive at school early; there is no socialization of the children. The only break in the school day (and Rachel is basically gone from 9-5) is a lunch period during which the students have to sit in ALPHABETICAL ORDER and no talking is allowed. During class time, from my understanding, there is no group work or anything that isn't rigidly doing your work.
So, each grade gets four "recesses" a year. On four occasions spread throughout the year, one of the elective classes (for Rachel those are PE and orchestra) is set aside and the children are allowed to go outside. First, they have to walk around something--the track, maybe? the perimeter of the school grounds?--and after they have ticked off the required walking (which has to be done in silence) then they can actually TALK TO OTHER STUDENTS. Since this NEVER happens at school--Rachel says she spends most of the day being absolutely silent and talks more at home than she ever does at school--the kids look forward to these days. Like, four times a year--you aren't even going to be able to get to know others well enough to make friends--but at least you can get to know someone a little bit better in this relaxed setting where you can talk to whomever you want to talk to.
So the Grade Seven students got their first "recess" of the year a few weeks ago. Five hundred students went outside and did what they were supposed to do--they did their required silent walking. And then students went here and there, scattered around, talking to each other. And that is when two of the 500 got into a fight. Clearly, most of the remaining 498 students wouldn't have even been aware that a fight happened, because they were off doing their own thing. For once!!! Literally, for once!!
And then, afterwards, they learned about the fight because the principal--or vice-principal over their grade--informed them that all other recesses for the year are cancelled for their grade because two students got into a fight. And just like that, their remaining three opportunities to actually talk to other students, and maybe learn how to interact with PEOPLE, which is sort of a necessary life-skill, are gone. They get to just be little learning, studying, test-taking, silent-at-lunch robots who stay in alphabetical order and end the year with exactly no new friends. Doesn't that sound delightful?
So that is why Rachel turned activist. I mean, they already don't have any rights at school, anyway, since they are pretty much regimented every second of the day. So those four recesses per year are greatly looked forward to. So 498 innocent children get to lose their recess rights for the entire year--admittedly, pretty small rights, since that means they only miss 3 recesses--because of two students who most of them don't even know. I mean, there were maybe a few kids who saw the fight and carry some guilt by association, but most of the kids--entirely innocent.
Rachel does want to be a lawyer someday; like the article about her--that never mentions her name except as Dr. Heiss's daughter--says, she grew up on Hamilton and she is well-schooled to think about human rights. I am proud of her, and I know that Uncle Clyde would be even prouder. If he heard about what is going on at her school, he would say, "I am pretty riled about that." And then proceed to do something about it.

