I honestly think that this issue, which is very personal and
tender and difficult, should be between a woman and her doctor. The difficulty
in the US is that so many of the people who need help in this way don't have,
and can't afford, good medical treatment. I am slightly biased, perhaps, having
grown up with socialized medicine and definitely believing that it is a much
better system--but in the US, people seem to get caught up on the question of
who pays for it. And if they are pro-life, they don't want to be paying for
someone else's abortion. Or insurance companies have policies of what they will
or won't pay for. In any case, it takes it out of the realm of the
doctor-patient relationship. It turns it into everybody's business, when in my
opinion it really should be nobody's business (except the patient and the
doctor). Way too much guessing and jumping to conclusions about the motivations
of others happens when everyone gets a say about it.
In the US system of health care—which, in my mind, isn’t
even a system; it is chaos—people who really need help don’t have access to it.
Which is why organizations like Planned Parenthood exist. They can get some
medical help and information to the most vulnerable people. They can help with
birth control so that future need/desire for abortions are lessened. People who
really are having abortions for the wrong reasons (inconvenience or whatever)
are way more likely to be the wealthy than the poor. The wealthy can do
whatever they want, anyway—fly to a different country, for example, to get what
they want. So if all abortions are made illegal, rich people can still do
whatever they want. But the really vulnerable people, who can't even see a
doctor—they are the ones who need protection. They are the ones who will suffer
at the hands of an illegal abortionist if they have nowhere else to turn.
In Canada, there are no abortion laws. So technically, the
question of abortion lies where it belongs, between a woman and her doctor, at
all stages of the game. But actually, very few late-term abortions are performed in
Canada, because since it is up to the doctor—most doctors won’t do it. But realistically, since all women have access to medical care (unless they live super remotely) those kinds of decisions can be made earlier, anyway. Since abortion is not in the criminal code,
the doctor and the woman are both free to follow their consciences and make the
best decision given the situation THAT NOBODY ELSE UNDERSTANDS because nobody
CAN understand another person’s life or motivation.
Since the decriminalization of abortion in Canada in 1988,
you might think that abortions would be trending upwards, and for the first
decade, that was true. However, after that, the number began dropping and has
been on a decline ever since—even though the population has been growing. http://abortionincanada.ca/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2013/02/Annual_20_203.pdf.
The number of abortions in 2010 was lower than the number in 1978. Yet the
population of Canada in 2010 was 34 million, while in 1978 it was only 24
million. I will leave it to you to do the math, but obviously the per capita
number of abortions has DROPPED, so putting health care decisions in the hands of
the woman and her doctor, in my opinion, when it comes to abortion, is a good
place to put it.
When I had my last child, born in British Columbia in 1994,
my doctor ordered an ultrasound because I was an older mom. Ultrasounds were
not routine in 1994. My doctor would not use an ultrasound to look for gender
at that time because wealthy people in British Columbia would use that
information to seek abortions. Since doctors in British Columbia would not
perform abortions for that reason, those people would go to Washington State to
procure their abortions. A lot of
Americans are stunned, horrified, and disbelieving when I tell them that. That
Canadians, living in a country with no abortion laws would go to a nation with
abortion laws seems to make NO SENSE. Except that—in the United States, the
motivating factor in medicine seems to be money, not actual good health, so
clearly these BC women who could afford it were able to find a doctor to do
what they wanted. Money can buy anything.
I personally consider myself neither pro-life NOR
pro-choice. I am pro mind your own business. Let a woman and her doctor make
decisions about things that you cannot understand. No one can understand your
life, and neither can you understand anyone else’s. We are all so different:
different mental and physical health, different financial and social
circumstances, different history and life experiences. How can we ever fully
understand all the ramifications of all pregnancies and make laws to cover all
situations? It is ridiculous to think we can. We can’t.
I have known women who have been carrying fetuses that were
destined to die (conditions not consistent with life) that decided to carry
those babies to their natural conclusions, and I have known women in those
situations who have terminated their pregnancies early. The outcome was the same in all cases: a dead
baby. Who are we to judge which of these women made a better choice? All of
these women were heartbroken. But they made different decisions about how to
handle these horrible circumstances based on what they and their doctors felt
was right for them.
Which is, in my opinion, how all pregnancies should be
handled.